Одна из Многих | One of Many (USSR 1927)

A Soviet girl dreams of Hollywood in the charming short combined live action/animated film Одна из Многих | One of Many (USSR 1927). Like Потцелй Мери Пикфорд | A Kiss for Mary Pickford, also 1927, One of Many takes its cue from Mary Pickford and Douglas Fairbanks’ visit to Russia in 1926. The story follows a film-obsessed young girl (played by Aleksandra Kudriavtseva) who arrives home, still dizzy with excitement.

Odna-iz-mnogikh-One-of-Many-opendoor

Because today was the day that she saw … Mary and Doug!

Odna iz Mnogikh One of Many (4) Mary & Doug

And not only that, but: “Mary SAW ME!” The inserted newsreel footage is cut so as to give the illusion of a special moment of eye contact between her and Mary & Doug.

Odna-iz-mnogikh-One-of-Many-excited

Her joy is palpable. “She’ll take me to – AMERICA!” And when the girl lies down to take a rest, she is transformed into a cartoon character – and the film enters an animated Hollywood dreamland.

Odna iz Mnogikh One of Many (7) Moloch

She awakes on Hollywood Boulevard, lit by signs and with a background graphic that sort of recalls the Moloch set from Metropolis. However, it’s most likely a reference to Intolerance, given that next up she meets none other than:

Odna iz Mnogikh One of Many (5) DWG    Odna iz Mnogikh One of Many (6) DWG

D. W. Griffith! Here described in an intertitle as the “Hollywood Bolshevik” … well, that’s one way of looking at him, I guess. From there, she meets Chaplin on the street – he’s mean to her and so she gets upset, but luckily Pat & Patachon (Karl Schenstrøm & Harald Madsen) are there to help her out.

Odna iz Mnogikh One of Many (9) Charlie    Odna iz Mnogikh One of Many (10) Pat und Patachon
The grimace of Chaplin; Pat und Patachon.

Pat und Patachon (originally Fy og Bi in their native Danish) are forerunners of Laurel and Hardy, in that they’re a screen comic duo made up of one tall skinny man and one short fat man. I’ve not been highly enthused about what I’ve seen of them, but they were very popular in Europe in their time. Really, their inclusion in this film is a bit surprising, as they never worked in Hollywood – but let’s not quibble. Pat and Patachon form a human horse to transport our heroine – all the better from which to spy Harold Lloyd’s motoring mishaps!

Odna-iz-mnogikh-One-of-Many-Harold-Lloyd

Skyscraper hi-jinks ensue before the girl is plucked from the sky by a dinosaur and completes the holy trinity of silent comedians by meeting the dino’s master: Buster Keaton, clothed in his caveman outfit from The Three Ages (1923).

Odna-iz-mnogikh-One-of-Many-Keaton-2

In contrast to her European compatriats Pat und Patachon, Hollywood comedians are nothing but trouble in this film. Buster drags her off by her hair and then lets her get snatched by a bandit who puts the girl in a vice and squishes her flat as a pancake. It’s cowboy star Tom Mix who comes to her rescue this time:

Odna iz Mnogikh One of Many (14) Tom Mix

The films dénouement, of course, involves Doug and Mary. Well, mostly Doug; my guess is that the writers/animators had trouble finding good caricature material for Mary. So we get Doug à la The Thief of Baghdad:

Odna-iz-mnogikh-One-of-Many-Fairbanks-flight

And The Gaucho Doug!

Odna-iz-mnogikh-One-of-Many-Doug-disguise

Needless to say, Doug saves the day. The girl wakes to see all of her movie portraits making faces at her from the wall …

Odna-iz-mnogikh-One-of-Many-posters-2

Doug; Mary; Keaton; Chaplin; Lloyd

One of Many was made at the famous Mezhrabpom-Rus studio in Moscow, directed by Nikolai Khodatayev, working with a mostly female team. I find the animation style very appealing – not polished, sure, but that adds to the charm. And as a device for looking at the difference between dreams, reality, and the movie screen, the combination of live action and animation is very successful. I first saw this film when it screened at the 2013 Giornate del Cinema Muto in Pordenone; I immediately thought of Sherlock, Jr. (1924; one of my all-time favourites), and indeed in the catalogue notes Sergei Kaptarev cites Keaton’s film, released in Russia as Одержимый | The Obsessed, as a possible reference.

sherlock-jr-soviet

Soviet poster via Cinefessions.

The film needs to be seen in the context of the Soviet Union’s New Economic Policy (NEP; 1921-28). Relative to the first years of the USSR (and of course, the Stalin era following it), the NEP was a period of greater economic and cultural freedom. That is not to say that it paralleled Western culture; in her article The Dance Class or the Working Class: The Soviet Modern Girl, Anne E. Gorsuch notes that the main sources of cultural transmission in the USSR differed from those in capitalist countries, with advertising, commerce, and the mass media functioning differently therein compared to in many other locales. Movies were a key source of international cultural information; between 1921 and 1931, the Soviet Union imported about 1700 American, German, and French films. Not surprisingly given the content of One of Many, Gorsuch cites Pickford, Fairbanks, Lloyd and Chaplin as the audience favourites.

Odna iz Mnogikh One of Many (3) M&D

Gorsuch’s focus is on the ‘Modern Girl’ figure: a new type of woman that emerged as a distinct phenomenon in the 1920s, known variously as flappers, garçonnes, neue Frauen, modeng xiaojie, etc. The student character in One of Many could be seen as an example of a Soviet Modern Girl; vivacious, flapperishly dressed, American-movie-obsessed … far from the more sober general ideal of the Komsomol, some of whose members considered a femme appearance to be unrevolutionary (though others embraced, or at least tolerated, American fashions in dancing, music, and clothing). Fashion as a powerful force for personal expression and creativity, or a capitalist diversion from true female liberation? An open question …

Odna iz Mnogikh One of Many (15) ever seen

One of Many is a fun look at Hollywood through the Soviet lens. As an intertitle asks: “HAVE YOU EVER SEEN ANYTHING LIKE IT?!.”

– – –

Одна из Многих [Odna iz Mnogikh]. Dir. Nikolai Khodatayev. Moscow: Mezhrabpom-Rus, 1927.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Films and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

9 Responses to Одна из Многих | One of Many (USSR 1927)

  1. VP says:

    I really enjoyed this writeup! I take great pleasure in the fact that the Soviets (Kuleshov and Eisenstein among many) were obsessed with Hollywood.

    Like

  2. Lea S. says:

    Geez Louise, this looks like a cool film. It has animation, awesome references to some of my favorite people, AND it’s Soviet. A triple treat. The animation style looks simple but it’s surprisingly modern–out of context I might not have guessed “1920s.”

    Like

  3. Anton says:

    Thank’s a lot for a nice review (I’ve watched this movie recently and didn’t recognize some parodies, but your review made everything clear – though I thought that Keaton rides Gertie the Dinosaur)

    Pat and Patachon were among the most popular and recognisable characters in Soviet Russia (as well as in Europe), some famous actors and duets started from imitating them (e.g. Nikolay Cherkasov), so their appearance here is not so strange (“foreign” almost equal to “Hollywood”, here foreign is essential, as irony about admiration of West)

    You have a wonderful blog. But not so many Soviet movies are reviewed (Protazanov, Vertov, Eisenstein, Dovzhenko etc.) Is this epoch not interestng for you or they are still ahead? That would be nice to read something about “The Lady and the Hooligan”, “Aelita”, “41st”, “Defence of Sevastopol” – some remarkable movies, that are not so famous.

    Like

    • Hallo Anton and thank you for your comment! You’re right, that is surely Gertie! And I see your point on Pat and Patachon, they were huge in Europe for sure.

      I’ve written a few times on the Tsarist cinema, but not so much on Soviet film (just Zvenigora and Kaufman’s In Spring. Well, you’ve already probably seen those entries). I actually like Soviet cinema a lot, but with a whole world of film, there are so many possible things to write about! And I will say that while I admire Eisenstein and particularly Vertov, I am unlikely to write about them – they are so canonized and theorized and talked about already, I don’t think I could add much. I’m a little surprised I haven’t covered any Protazanov, though – I enjoy him, and have seen quite a few of his films. As for The Lady and the Hooligan and The 41st, I actually haven’t watched either of those yet, so I’ll have to get onto that! Some Soviet titles I would like to eventually cover are Kozintsev & Trauberg’s The New Babylon, maybe one or two of the other Ukrainian Soviet films, Mikaberidze’s My Grandmother. Watch this space :)

      Like

      • Anton says:

        I cannot but agree about Eisenstein and Vertov. Right you are: it has been written a lot about them, and many less known authors are waiting for coverage. “The 41st” by Protazanov is a bit forgotten adaptation of a remarkable short novel by Boris Lavrenyov. The later adaptation by Chuhray (1956), which has won the special prize in Cannes, is much more famous, and that was curious to compare these adaptations from two different worlds: before WWII and after. “The Lady and the Hooligan” is not so remarkable, but it has a brilliant Soviet poet Vladimir Mayakovskiy as a featured actor and co-director, and that was one of the first Russian movies of new era. I am also glad to read your forecast and I will surely watch this space :)

        P.S. Let me know if you’ll need help with translation of intertitles from Russian to English. I’ll be glad to be of service to you.

        Like

        • The 41st does look good, and I quite like Ivan Koval-Samborsky. And with “Hooligan”, the Mayakovsky connection is certainly a drawcard. Anna Sten’s films were another one I was going to mention – love her!
          I don’t write that frequently but hopefully I will get there in the end. :)

          Thanks for the offer! I may take you up on it. I can read Cyrillic script and know a few words of Russian, but anything extensive is a bit beyond me.

          Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s